The short version
Truvaga 350 wins on hardware provenance and stimulation precision; Pulsetto wins on protocol variety, daily-use form factor and price. The session-lifetime cap on Truvaga is the wildcard for long-term ownership economics.
When Truvaga 350 is the right pick
If you value the gammaCore lineage — the same manufacturing pedigree, the same waveform, the same company as the only FDA-cleared non-invasive VNS device — Truvaga 350 is the right shape. The clinical heritage is real, even if the consumer indication itself is not FDA-cleared.
When Pulsetto is the right pick
If you want a daily-use collar with four guided programmes, structured 4–20 minute sessions and no session lifetime cap, Pulsetto is the right shape. At $269 versus Truvaga’s $499 it is roughly half the price for broader programme variety. Most consumer users land here.